SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BAL MUKAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent


214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.02.2026 BAL MUKAND ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Sumit Saddi, Advocate and Mr. Karanvir Singh Kathuria, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel)

for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate and Ms. Ayushi, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J (Oral):

1 The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to make the payment of interest on the delayed payments of pensionary benefits @ 12 % per annum from the date of due payments to the date of actual payments.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner retired from the post of Lower Division Clerk (L.D.C.) on 31.05.2007 after attaining the age of superannuation. The pension payment order of the petitioner was prepared on 26.08.2013. The first cheque as arrears of pensionary benefits was issued only on 31.10.2013 and the remaining amount was paid on 19.12.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top