114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 05.02.2026 AMRIK SINGH ....Petitioner Versus INDERPAL KAUR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Parmod Goyal, J. (Oral)

Petitioner/plaintiff is aggrieved by impugned order dated

29.05.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Naraingarh and order dated 07.01.2026, passed by learned District Judge, Ambala, whereby application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC as well as appeal against dismissal of his application, were dismissed by the Court of first instance and learned Appellate Court.

2. Petitioner/plaintiff had preferred a suit for grant of decree of permanent injunction restraining respondents/defendants No.1 to 3 from alienating, mortgaging or creating any sort of charge over the prime front portion of the plot comprised in Khewat No.724//663/2, Khatoni No.836, Khasra No.19//2/2 measuring 1 kanal 14 marlas situated within the revenue estate of Village Dera, H.B. No.190, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. Along with the suit he had preferred application und