SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2932

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KAPURTHALA THROUGH ITS EO/PRESIDENT – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 03.02.2026 Baldev Singh .......... Appellant-plaintiff Versus Municipal Council, Kapurthala .......... Respondent-defendant.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present:- Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the appellant-plaintiff.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2023 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Kapurthala (hereinafter to be referred as “First Appellate Court”), whereby an appeal preferred by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 17.01.2020 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)-IV, Kapurthala (hereinafter to be referred as “trial Court”), in his suit for permanent injunction, was dismissed; thereby affirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court.

[2] Briefly stating, the appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction to the effect that he was owner of the suit land as detailed in the head note of the plaint as well as shown in the site plan. It was pleaded that since he (plaintiff) was the owner of the said land, thus, no relief was cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top