SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2952

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJEEV BAKSHI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT LTD – Respondent


267 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-514-2025(O&M)

Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 RAJEEV BAKSHI AND ANOTHER ....Petitioner(s)

Versus ALM INFOTECH CITY PVT. LTD.

.....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Sonal Anand, Advocate, Ms. Surbhi, Singh, Advocate, Mr. Reshab Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Paramjit Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences which have arisen between the parties pertaining to an agreement entered into between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that vide Annexure P-1, a lease deed was executed between the parties, which contains an arbitration clause i.e. Clause 24, which provides that in case any dispute or controversy arises between the parties, then the same shall be referred to a Sole Arbitrator. He submitted that a dispute arose between

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top