SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2974

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRABHJOT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Prabhjot Kaur …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 15.01.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 27.01.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on 27.01.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Argued by : Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate with Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Surya Kumar, A.A.G., Punjab with Mr. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Director, Department of Transport, Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 25.01.2022 (Annexure P-12), whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Clerk on compassionate ground has been rejected. Further, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on Class-III post like Clerk etc. as she i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top