SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3088

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHER – Appellant
Versus
LABH SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Punjab and others .....Appellants Versus Labh Singh (now deceased) through his LRs .....Respondent

1. Reserved on : 10.02.2026 2. Pronounced on : 17.02.2026 3. Uploaded on the website : 17.02.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is : Full pronounced or full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full : Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Argued by : Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab for the appellants.

Mr. Rohit Kataria, Advocate for Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate for the respondent.

****

NAMIT KUMAR , J .

1. The appellants/defendants-State of Punjab are in Regular Second Appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 06.06.1995, passed by learned First Appellate Court, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent/plaintiff, has been accepted and the judgment and decree dated 23.07.1994, passed by learned Trial Court has been set aside and the suit of the respondent/plaintiff has been decreed and the impugned order of dismissal dated 25.05.1989 and order dismissing his appeal, have been set aside.

2. Parties to the lis he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top