SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 105

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JEET SINGH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


CRR-1137-2021 (O&M)

-1-

103

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CRR-1137-2021 (O&M)

Date of decision : 05.10.2021

Jeet Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.

(Through Video Conferencing)

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

Challenge in the present Criminal Revision Petition is to the

judgment dated 07.12.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,

Kurukshetra, as well as the judgment dated 27.01.2020 passed by the

Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra.

The Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kurukshetra, vide its

judgment dated 07.12.2015, had convicted the present petitioners under

Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter to be referred as

“the IPC”) read with Section 120-B of the IPC and had sentenced the

petitioners to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years

and also liable to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of payment

of fine, they were further directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

PAWAN KUMAR

2021.10.06 18:22

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this docu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top