SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 25

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BHANU PARKASH – Appellant
Versus
SHARDA AND ORS – Respondent


CR No. 617 of 2013

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR No. 617 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of Decision : 19.02.2015

Bhanu Parkash

....Petitioner

Versus

Sharda and others

....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

1.

Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?

Present:

Mr. Anil Kumar Gahlawat, Advocate

for the petitioner.

None for the respondents.

R.P. Nagrath, J.

Petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this

Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set

aside the order dated 18.08.2012 (Annexure P-5) passed by the

learned Rent Controller whereby the application to pass ejectment

order against the respondents on account of failure to deposit the

assessed rent within the statutory period has been dismissed.

2.

The predecessor of the respondents was rented out

two shops on a monthly rent of ` 250/- i.e. @ ` 125/- per month for

each shop. The respondents have inherited the tenancy. The

eviction of the respondents was sought on the grounds inter alia;

that the respondents ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top