HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PUSHPINDER KAUR SODHI – Appellant
Versus
AMANDEEP KAUR AND ANR. – Respondent
RSA No. 1193 of 2017 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 1193 of 2017 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 2.3.2017
Pushpinder Kaur Sodhi
.....Appellant
Vs.
Amandeep Kaur and another
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present :
Mr. Kawaljyot Singh, Advocate
for the appellant.
****
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)
Feeling aggrieved against the impugned judgments and decrees
passed by the learned courts below, whereby suit for declaration filed by the
plaintiff was partly decreed by the learned trial court and first appeal of the
defendants was also party accepted by the learned first appellate court,
defendant No.1 has approached this Court by way of present regular second
appeal.
Brief facts of the case, as noticed by learned trial court in para 2
of its impugned judgment, are that house in question fell to the share of
Kuljit Singh, father of plaintiff, in a partition between brothers which was
held on 4.3.1992 and was recognised in a decree passed by the court of Sub
Judge 3rd Class, Patiala, in Suit No. 264 dated 27.7.1991 decided on 7.4.1992
Amit Kumar
2017.03.16 17:39
I attest to the accuracy and
in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.