SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARMOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-51371-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.02.2026 Parmod ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Manu Singh Sheokhand, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the complainant.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0275 dated 14.10.2024, registered under Section 24 of the Emigration Act, 1983 and Sections 3(5), 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Nathu Sarai Chopta, District Sirsa.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the disposal of the present petitions are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written complaint submitted by complainant Amit on 14.10.2024 alleging therein that accused Subhash and Seema, who were his uncle and maternal aunt respectively, arranged his meeting with accused Rakesh, Sunita and Parmod (petitioner). Accused Rakesh is the son-in-law of his maternal aunt, accused Sunita is his cousin and the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top