SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3211

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) LAKHWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
JAI NARAIN AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (221) Reserved on:18.02.2026 Pronounced on: 20.02.2026 Uploaded on: 20.02.2026

1. FAO No. 4616 of 2005 (O&M)

Lakhwinder Singh And Others … Appellants Versus Jai Narain And Others … Respondents AND

2. FAO No. 4617 of 2005 (O&M)

Attar Singh … Appellant Versus Jai Narain And Others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kapish Singla, Advocate, Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the Appellant in both FAOs Mr. Devinder Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 to 2 in both FAOs Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 *****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J

1. These two appeals have been preferred by the claimants against the common award dated 03.03.2005 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal, in two connected claim petitions arising out of the same accident. Since both the appeals emanate from a common award and involve identical questions of fact and law, they are being disposed of together by this common judgment.

B ACKGROUND FACTS

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 21.04.2003 at about 9:30 PM, Satnam Singh, aged about 35 years, was riding a bicycle on G.T. Road near village Samana Bahu. At

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top