SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3308

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASVIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent



221/5.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.02.2026 Jasvir Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab.

-----

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for implementation of Old Pension Scheme, and implementing the notification dated 02.04.2004 (Annexure P-4) with retrospective effect in complete violation of well-settled law settled by this Court vide judgment dated 12.12.1991 (Annexure P-9) passed in CWP- 3397-1991 titled as Beant Singh Bedi Versus State of Punjab and others against which LPA as well as SLP filed by the respondents had also been dismissed.

notification dated 22.05.2025 issued by the Government of Punjab, Department of Finance ((Finance Pension Policy and Coordination), wherein the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-1, Part-1, have been amended and the said amendment reads as under:-

“1. (1) These rules may be called the Punjab Civil Services (Amendment) Rules, Volume-I, Part-I, 2025.

(2) They shall come into force at once.

2. In the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-I, Part-I, in rule 1.2, in sub–rule (1), after the existing proviso, the following provisos shall be added, namely:-

“Provided further that the rules in Part 1- Pensions and Part II Provident Fund contained in Volume-II of these rules called the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-II, shall also apply to the Government employees who are appointed to the posts mentioned in categories (1) to (5) above on or after the 1st January, 2004, but whose posts or vacancies were advertised for recruitment before 1st January, 2004.

Provided further that the rules in Part 1-Pensions and Part II-Provident Fund contained in volume-II of these rules called the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Volume-II, shall also apply to the Government employees who have been appointed on compassionate grounds on or after 1st January, 2004 but where the request by the legal heir for appointment was received before 1st January, 2004 and the concerned legal heir had fulfilled the eligibility criteria i.e. age; education qualification; or any other requirement required for that post before 1st January, 2004.

Provided further that such employees recruited on or after 1st January, 2004, shall have an option either to opt for the Old Pension Scheme or New Defined Contributory Pension Scheme. In case the employee does not exercise the option within three months from the date of publication of the Punjab Civil Services (Amendment) Rules, Volume-I, Part-1, 2025, such employee shall be deemed to have opted for the New Defined Contributory Pension Scheme.

KRISHAN KUMAR, Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Finance”

of the petitioner is squarely covered under the said amendment and the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Old Pension Scheme. He further submits that the claim of similarly situated person, namely, Lakhwinder Singh, District Vocational Coordinator (Vocational Master, Electrical), in CWP-20176-2022, has been considered by the respondents in terms of said amendment and has been accepted, vide order dated 05.09.2025.

3. Learned State counsel submits that the case of the petitioner shall be re-considered in the light of said amendment to the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-1, Part-1, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Disposed of in the above terms.

5. Needless to mention here that if the petitioner is found entitled to the benefit, as claimed, the necessary exercise shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant rules/instructions within a period of two months and in case the cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top