SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3320

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMAN @ SUMAN PUNIA – Appellant
Versus
CHAMELI DEVI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.02.2026 Suman @ Suman Punia … Petitioner Versus Chameli Devi … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Jangra, Advocate, and Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 31.05.2019 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Hisar, vide which the application instituted by the petitioner/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint was dismissed.

2. A suit (Annexure P-2) was instituted by the respondent/plaintiff (Chameli Devi) against the petitioner/defendant (Suman) for symbolic possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 21.10.2011, executed qua a plot measuring 97 sq. yards (fully described in the plaint), situated at Village Satrod Khurd, Tehsil and District Hisar.

3. An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is stated to have been moved by the petitioner/defendant s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top