SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3321

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHANDER BHAN – Appellant
Versus
ABHEY RAM AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6331-2019 (O&M)

Date of decision: 18.02.2026 Chander Bhan ...Petitioner Versus Abhey Ram (deceased) through his LRs and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anurag Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1(i).

(Through Video Conferencing)

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

CM-46-CII-2026

1. This is an application filed under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 of CPC for impleading the legal representatives of respondent No.1-Abhey Ram.

2. For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the present application is allowed and legal representatives of respondent No.1-Abhey Ram as mentioned in para 2 of the application are ordered to be impleaded as party subject to just exceptions and solely for the purpose of pursuing the main revision petition and the same would not be construed as an adjudication on the entitlement of the estate of respondent No.1-Abhey Ram.

3. Amended memo of parties is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main case

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top