SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3387

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TARSEM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 27.02.2026 Tarsem Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Gagandeep Singh Sirphikhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Ms. Dhwani Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant under Section 483(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No. 2- Bikram Singh in case bearing FIR No. 240 dated 31.08.2024, registered under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC at Police Station Civil Lines Batala, Police District Batala, vide order dated 07.10.2024, passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur.

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of the present petition are the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the petitioner/complainant alleging that his son Harvinder Singh, was having a plot in the area of New Urban Estate, Batala and want

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top