IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUNIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-71097-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(125) CRM-M-71097-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision : 27.02.2026
MUNIR SINGH
... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Arvinder Arora, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana
**** (cid:1)
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section
483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant
of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.309 dated 27.09.2025 registered
under Sections 110, 115, 118(2), 190, 191(3) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita at Police Station Naraingarh, District Ambala.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of the
statement got recorded by the complainant Vishal alleging therein that on the
evening of 26.09.2025, he was present at Krishna Market alongwith his friends
Harsh and Manish, when the petitioner accompanied by the co-accused formed
an unlawful assembly and opened an assault upon him. The petitioner struck
1 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 27-02-2026 21:28:45 :::
##PAGE2##CRM-M-71097-2025 (O&M) 2
blow with the gear-welded rod on his head, whereas the other accused also
caused injuries on his person with their respective weapons. When his friends
rushed for his rescue, they too sustained injuries at the hands of the assailants
and then they fled away.
3. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated.
The petitioner was arrested on 27.09.2025. The weapon used in the crime was
recovered at his instance. The co-accused were also arrested. Investigation now
stands completed.
4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case. A false recovery has been planted upon him. He
is in custody since 27.09.2025. The trial will take considerable time to
conclude. His further incarceration would not serve any useful purpose. It is,
therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed.
5. Per contra, learned state counsel while relying upon the status
report, has argued that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature.
He alongwith the coaccused had voluntary caused simple as well as grievous
injuries on the person of the complainant and one of his friends. The material
witnesses are yet to be examined. There are chances of petitioner’s intimidating
those witnesses, if extended benefit of bail. His antecedents are not clean. It is,
therefore, argued that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
2 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 27-02-2026 21:28:45 :::
##PAGE3##CRM-M-71097-2025 (O&M) 3
6. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel
for both the parties at considerable length.
7. The petitioner by forming membership of an unlawful assembly
with the co-accused is alleged to have voluntarily caused injuries on the person
of the complainant and his two friends. The injury that has been attributed to the
petitioner has been opined to be grievous in nature. The allegations prima facie
make out a case for commission of the subject offences as against the petitioner.
However, he is in custody since 27.09.2025. He is not required for further
investigation. The trial is yet to commence and obviously it will take
considerable time to conclude. As such no fruitful purpose would be served by
continued detention of the petitioner. The well settled proposition of law is that
bail is the rule and jail is an exception. Pre-trial incarceration should not be
replica of post-conviction sentencing. The object of the jail is to secure
appearance of the accused during trial, and it cannot be preventive or punitive.
In view of the discussion as made above, this Court is of the opinion that a case
is made out for grant of bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the
petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to
his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned
tri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.