SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3403

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPANSHU ALIAS DEEPANSHU RAM RAKHYANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DECIDED ON: 27.02.2026 DEEPANSHU @DEEPANSHU RAM RAKHYANI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Haryana.

****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral):

This petition seeking for interim bail has been filed on the ground that the mother of the petitioner is seriously ill, as she is suffering from paralysis and the abovementioned ailment has rendered her disabled up to the extent of 80%.

2. The record reveals that the petitioner is lodged in District Jail, Mewat for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 21 and 29 of NDPS Act and Section 238 of the BNS in FIR No.277 dated 24.12.2024.

3. Notice of the petition has already been served upon the State. A detailed reply as well as the custody certificate of the petitioner has been filed by the State. The same be taken on record.

4. A perusal of abovementioned reply shows that the fact has not been disputed that the mother of petitioner is suffering from paralysis and is disabled to the extent of 80%.

5. Heard.

6. It has been contended by learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top