SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) MISHRI – Appellant
Versus
DHAN SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (223) RSA No. 3665 of 2000 (O&M)

Reserved On : 23.02.2026 Pronounced On : 27.02.2026 Uploaded On :

Mishri (since deceased) through Lrs ...Appellant Versus Dhan Singh (since deceased) through Lrs ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for LRs of the appellant.

Mr. Sukhandeep Singh, Advocate and Mr. Ram Lal Yadav, Advocate for LRs of the respondent.

***

Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-defendant against the judgment and decree dated 03.03.1998 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Palwal, whereby the suit of the respondent-plaintiff for declaration and possession was decreed, and against the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad, dismissing the appeal and affirming the findings recorded by the trial Court.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that respondent-plaintiff Dhan Singh had filed the suit for declaration and possession of suit property before the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Palwal in which it was submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top