IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

CR-1988-2026 Date of decision: 26.02.2026 Bani Ram . . . . Petitioner Vs.

Pooja and others . . . . Respondents ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA ****

Present: - Dr. A.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

The present revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff assailing the order dated 03.10.2025 (Annexure P1) passed by the learned trial Court, whereby his application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction was dismissed, as well as the appellate order dated 07.01.2026 (Annexure P2) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa affirming the said decision.

2. The petitioner instituted a suit for declaration and permanent injunction claiming that in a settlement between the parties, a passage measuring 3 karam in width had been provided to enable him to access his land comprised in Rectangle No.42 Khasra No.3 through the northern side of Khasra Nos.1 and 2, which had fallen to the share of the defendants. It is contended that despite existence of such passage at the spot, both Courts below failed to protect the petitioner’s right by way of temporary injunctio