SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3440

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAI PARKASH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
RAJBALA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


311 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2120-2021 (O&M)

Date of decision: 26.02.2026 Jai Parkash and others ...Petitioners Versus Rajbala and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate and Mr. M.L. Singhwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 05.09.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri and order dated 04.08.2021 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Additional District Judge, Charkhi Dadri.

2. On 28.09.2021, a Coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-

CM-9455-CII-2021 The application is allowed as prayed for.

CR-2120-2021 It is submitted by the counsel for petitioners that besides the writing dated 08.03.1963, which shows that the land in question was purchased by the grand-father of the petitioner, even the revenue record qua the same land show the grand- father of the petitioner to be in possession of the same as gair morusi tenant. Therefore,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top