IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KAUR SINGH GREWAL ......Petitioner Vs.

GURDEEP KAUR AND ORS. ......Respondents Reserved on : 18.02.2026 Pronounced on: 25.02.2026 Uploaded on: 25.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. B.B.S. Sobti, Advocate (through v.c.)

Ms. Savpreet Gujral, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate for respondent No.1(a).

Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The challenge in the present revision petition is to order dated

01.10.2025 vide which two applications were allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana has wrongly allowed the applications filed by the respondents. He therefore, prays that the present revision petition be allowed.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents contends that the applications were rightly allowed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, therefore, he prays that the present revision petition be dismissed.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties an