SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3510

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ABDUL GAFFAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved On: 16.02.2026 Date of Decision: 25.02.2026 Uploaded On: 25.02.2026 ABDUL GAFFAR ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …….Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *****

Present: - None for the petitioner.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J.

The instant criminal revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur Jhirka, whereby the private respondents were acquitted of the charges leveled against them as well as against the judgment dated 06.12.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mewat vide which appeal filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed.

2. Learned Counsel for the revisionist-petitioner is not present. The situation was the same on the last date of hearing as well. Further wait is not justified. The revision pertains to 2018 and already a period of 8 years has elapsed since then. Counsel for the petitioner has been seeking date on all hearings. Therefore, the present case is being adjudicated on merits.

3. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution was launched on the complaint of the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top