IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM RATTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HRY. & ORS. – Respondent
342 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
Date of Decision: 24.02.2026
1. CWP-1253-2006 (O&M)
Ram Rattan ...Petitioner(s)
Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondent(s)
2. CWP-10474-2009 (O&M)
Ram Rattan ...Petitioner(s)
Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-1253-2006
2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of adverse remarks recorded in his Annual Confidential Report (‘ACR’) for the period from 03.11.2002 to 31.03.2003. He is further seeking setting aside of order dated 17.06.2009 whereby he has been retired upon attaining the age of 55 years.
3. The petitioner belonged to Haryana Police Force. He was promoted from time to time. When he was holding rank of Inspector, he was assigned charge of investig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.