SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM RATTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HRY. & ORS. – Respondent


342 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision: 24.02.2026

1. CWP-1253-2006 (O&M)

Ram Rattan ...Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondent(s)

2. CWP-10474-2009 (O&M)

Ram Rattan ...Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-1253-2006

2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of adverse remarks recorded in his Annual Confidential Report (‘ACR’) for the period from 03.11.2002 to 31.03.2003. He is further seeking setting aside of order dated 17.06.2009 whereby he has been retired upon attaining the age of 55 years.

3. The petitioner belonged to Haryana Police Force. He was promoted from time to time. When he was holding rank of Inspector, he was assigned charge of investig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top