IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (118 Date of Decision:-24.02.2026 PANKAJ NAGPAL … Petitioner Versus MOHINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Ambanshu Sahni, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing).

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The instant revision petition, instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against and seeks to impugn the legality and propriety of the order dated 15.12.2025 (Annexure P-1), whereby the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram, has been pleased to allow the application moved by the respondent for the appointment of a Local Commissioner.

2. The respondent–plaintiff had purchased the plot in question from the petitioner by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 21.03.2018, measuring 1022.58 square yards. Subsequently, upon allegedly raising a boundary wall around the plot, the respondent–plaintiff claimed to have discovered that the actual area in his possession measured only 1006.08 square yards, thereby asserting a shortfall of 16.05 square yards. On the basis of the said alleged