SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3571

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAMJI DASS – Appellant
Versus
VIPAN KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119 Date of Decision:-24.02.2026 RAMJI DASS … Petitioner Versus VIPAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to assail the order dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-15) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kalka, whereby the application preferred by the respondent-plaintiff under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “CPC”) seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner has been allowed.

2. The suit, in brief, has been instituted by the respondent- plaintiff for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the petitioner and other defendants from interfering with his alleged peaceful possession over the suit land, fully described in the head-note of the plaint, forming part of Khasra No. 1034 (4-1), situated in village Marranwala, Hadbast No. 95, Tehsil Kalka, as reflected in the Jamabandi for the year 2022–23

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top