SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3573

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: January 22, 2026 Date of Pronouncement: February 24, 2026 Uploaded on: February 24, 2026 Paramjit Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS Satish Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Yashdeep Nain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal and Mr.Ojas Bansal, Advocates for the respondent.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the revision petition is to the order dated

19.11.2014 passed by learned Executing Court, whereby, the objections filed by the respondent-judgment debtor, in the execution petition, were allowed and the execution petition was dismissed.

In pursuance of the notice issued, the respondent- judgment debtor made appearance through counsel.

The background facts, to be noticed, are as follows:-

That, the petitioner, is the original plaintiff-decree holder (hereinafter referred as petitioner only). He instituted a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 11.01.2002 against the respondent-original defendant- judgment debtor (hereinafter referred as respondent only). The suit was instituted on 14.06.2005 and it came to be decreed on 12.12.2009 In the said decre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top