IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

CR-3758-2022(O&M)

Date of decision : 24.02.2026 Chunni Lal and another ... Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Anuj Goyal, Advocate for respondent no.4.

VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)

1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 12.07.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Gurugram, vide which the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC filed by respondent no.4/applicant Mukesh Kumar for impleading him as party /

defendant no.4 has been allowed.

petitioners had filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction against respondents no.1 to 3 and they were not claiming any relief against respondent no.4 yet respondent no.4 at the stage of defendant evidence moved an application for being impleaded as defendant on the plea that he was the owner of khasra no.21/9/1(1-3) situated in village Sukhrali, Tehsil and District Gurg