IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 24.02.2026 B.T. Trading Company …Petitioner V/s Smt. Alka Bansal …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Premjit Singh Hundal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kanwar Harjinder Singh, Advocate and Mr. Jasjeet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)

The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the Court of District Judge, Gurugram, vide which the appeal preferred against order dated 11.05.2023 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Pataudi rejecting the plaint by invoking the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the “CPC”) was allowed and the respondent-plaintiff was called upon to deposit the ad valorem Court fee.

2. A suit for recovery of Rs.11 lakhs along with interest @ 12% p.a. was instituted by the respondent-plaintiff (Alka Bansal) against the petitioner- defendant (B.T. Trading Company) in the Court of Civil Judge, (Jr. Divn.), Pataudi (Annexure P-1). During the pendency o