SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HARYANA ETC. – Appellant
Versus
ROSHAN LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Haryana and others .....Appellants Versus Roshan Lal (deceased) through his LRs .....Respondents

1. Reserved on : 13.02.2026 2. Pronounced on : 24.02.2026 3. Uploaded on the website : 24.02.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is : Full pronounced or full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full : Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Argued by : Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana for the appellants assisted by ASI Surender Singh.

Mr. Babbar Bhan Dhayal, Advocate for the LRs of the respondent.

****

NAMIT KUMAR , J .

1. The appellants/defendants are in Regular Second Appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 07.08.1996, passed by the learned First Appellate Court, whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1992, passed by the learned Trial Court, has been reversed and the suit of the respondent/plaintiff has been decreed.

2. Parties to the lis hereinafter shall be referred to by their original position before the learned Trial Court.

3. The pleaded case of the plaintiff is that he was initially enrolled as a Con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top