IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:23.02.2026 Raj Kumar ...Appellant Versus Pritam Chand ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Gulzar Mohammad, Advocate for appellant.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

Appellant-defendant has preferred present appeal being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 23.01.2020 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, Punjab vide which suit for mandatory injunction preferred by respondent-plaintiff seeking direction to appellant- defendant to remove his belongings, vacate the suit property and hand over the same to respondent-plaintiff was decreed as well as judgment and decree dated 31.01.2026 passed by Additional District Judge, Jalandhar vide which first appeal preferred by appellant-defendant was dismissed.

2. Respondent-plaintiff had filed suit for mandatory injunction, whereby he sought possession of house owned by him, as fully described in the plaint. Respondent-plaintiff had claimed that appellant-defendant, being his son, was allowed to use and occupy suit property after his marriage as licensee. However, subsequently, appellant-defendant started disrespecting the respondent-plaintiff a