IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PIYUSH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Piyush Pandey ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana ... Respondent 1. The date when the judgment is reserved 26.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 27.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 28.02.2026 website
4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced
5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.).
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Aakash Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.
...
Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.288, dated 29.10.2025, registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 340 and 61 of the BNS, at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad, District Faridabad.
2. As per the allegations, the petitioner had induced the complainant to part with a sum of Rs.63.54 lakhs by way of transfer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.