SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3702

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PIYUSH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Piyush Pandey ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana ... Respondent 1. The date when the judgment is reserved 26.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 27.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 28.02.2026 website

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.).

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Aakash Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

...

Manisha Batra, J. (Oral).

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.288, dated 29.10.2025, registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 340 and 61 of the BNS, at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2. As per the allegations, the petitioner had induced the complainant to part with a sum of Rs.63.54 lakhs by way of transfer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top