IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 11.12.2025 Pronounced on: 27.02.2026 Uploaded on: 27.02.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full Judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment M/S SHRI KRISHNA POULTRY FEED ... PETITIONER Versus CANARA BANK THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate (arguing counsel)

Ms. Neelam Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner/Borrower.

Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate for the respondent/Bank.

*****

SANJIV BERRY, J.

1. The present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking writ of Certiorari for setting aside of the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in appeal No. 279/2024, besides seeking writ of Mandamus directing the DRAT to hear the appeal without any further demand of deposits as the requisite amount of 50% pre-deposit stipulated in the second proviso to Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Inte