110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 27.02.2026 Rahul Yadav ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. J.S. Toor, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate and Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate and Ms. Manreet Kaur, Advocate for the respondent(s)-HSAMB.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned transfer order dated 21.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2. Further, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to frame a proper transfer policy and till then not to transfer the petitioner.

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been made a shuttlecock. In his 16 years of service, he has been transferred 18 times with 10 of those transfers occurring in the last 10 years since his promotion. Vide impugned order dated 21.02.2026 (Annex