SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5992-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 26.02.2026 Ravi ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 (P-15) whereby the respondent No.3 has rejected the claim of the petitioner for appointing him on Group-C post in lieu of his land acquired by the respondents for the construction of Rajiv Gandhi Thermal Power Plant, in violation of the government policy/Decision dated 14.02.2012/05.07.2007 (Annexure P-6) and in complete violation of judgment dated 26.11.2015 (Annexure P-13) and judgment dated 07.08.2023 (Annexure P-12). Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner on Group-C post on the basis of his qualifications as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top