SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
RAN SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Haryana & ors. ......Appellants vs.

Ran Singh …..Respondent Date of Reserve: 20.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:26.02.2026 Uploaded on:- 27.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the respondent.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 08.05.2023 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Bhiwani whereby the appeal filed by respondent/plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 26.09.2019 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn) Bhiwani, was decreed in his favour to the effect that he would be entitled interest @ 9% per annum from the date the amount is due till its realization.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Brief facts of the case as per civil suit are that respondent /plaintiff retired as Sub Inspector on 31.01.2015. All the retiral payments were to be paid to the respondent/plaintiff for his retirement which were not paid in time. Hence, he filed civil suit for payment o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top