SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ WATI – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH KUMAR AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 Raj Wati .…Appellant Versus Ramesh Kumar and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. RitikMohindra, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 2-Insurance Company.

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

1. The appellant-claimant has filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation of ₹8,02,600/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani (for short ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide Award dated 22.09.2014, passed in MACT Petition No. 234 of 2013 dated 26.09.2013 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The sole claimant is the 52-year-old mother of deceased-Pritam who was 24 years old at the time of accident.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the learned Tribunal on the basis of pleadings and evidence adduced before it concluded that deceased-Pritam, had died due to injuries, suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 08.09.2013 due to the rash and negligent driving of Tractor bearing registration No. HR-16-L-2104 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the offending vehicle’) o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top