SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OFHARYANA – Appellant
Versus
JAI SINGH ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

State of Haryana .....Appellant Vs.

Jai Singh and others .....Respondents 1. Judgment reserved on 24.02.2026 2. Judgment pronounced on 25.02.2026 3. Judgment uploaded on 26.02.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment isFull pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced.

5. The delay, if any of the pronouncement is in full Nil judgment and reason thereof.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Argued By:-Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana for the appellant.

****

Yashvir Singh Rathor, J.

1. This regular second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.2001 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Panipat, vide which appeal preferred by the defendant- appellant against the judgment and decree dated 19.09.1996 vide which suit filed by the plaintiffs had been decreed, has been dismissed.

2. Case of plaintiffs is that plaintiffs and proforma defendants No.2 to 10 are owners in possession of the suit property detailed in para No.4 of the plaint.

Plaintiffs No.1, 2 and defendants No.3 and 4 over half share and plaintiffs No.2 and 3 and defendants No.5 to 10 are owners to the ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top