SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3802

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

208(2 cases) Date of Decision: February 24, 2026

1. CWP-9196-2021 Bhupinder Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..Respondents

2. CWP-3878-2020 Sunil Kumar and another .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate for Mr.Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-9196-2021.

Ms. Tehermehakdeep, Advocate for Ms. Dhivya Jerath, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-3878-2020.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Aakash Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 in CWP-9196-2021.

Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Mr. Hardeep Singh Poonia and Mr. Mister Ojasvi Taak, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 in CWP-9196-2021 and 3878-2020.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)

1. This order of mine shall dispose of the above-mentioned writ petitions as they arise from a similar factual matrix. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP-9196-2021.

2. The present writ petition(s) have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ or order in the nature of certiorari fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top