IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:-18.02.2026 Pronounced on:- 23.02.2026 Uploaded on:-

Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment GURDEEP SINGH ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Pardeep K. Bajaj, Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Singh and Mr. Ankit Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Dhiraj Jindal, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 7.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing official respondents No. 1 to 4 to produce the minor child/detenue namely Gursher Singh, aged about 4 years, who has been illegally detained by private respondents No. 5 to 7 or any of their relatives, as the said minor/detenue has been illegally removed from the lawful custody of the petitioner from Denmark and in violation of Orders (Annexure P-4) passed by the Agency of Family Law, Denmark, by Respondent No. 7-Rekha, and has been brought to District Patiala, Punjab, India,