118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:20.02.2026 JOGINDER SINGH ...Petitioner Vs.

BHAGTI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition is being filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-10) passed by the learned Executing Court, Karnal in EXE-04-2022. Vide the said order, the learned Executing Court disposed of the application for reframing of issues by modifying its earlier order dated 01.09.2025 and proceeded to reframe the issues in a manner that is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the settled provisions of law. The learned Court failed to appreciate the factual matrix of the case in its true and proper perspective, resulting in grave prejudice to the petitioner.

1. Whether the alleged agreement to sell dated 13.09.1990 was legally and validly execute by Sadhu Ram in favour of Joginder Singh ? OPO

2. If the answer is in affirmative, whether the objector is entitled for specific performance