SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARDIK NANDA – Appellant
Versus
PANJAB UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 19.02.2026 Hardik Nanda ….Petitioner Versus Panjab University and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Jattana, Advocate, and Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate, for the respondent-University.

****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral)

1) The petitioner, who is a student of B.A./B.Com. LL.B. (Hons.) 5 Years Integrated Course of the respondent-University, is compelled to beseech indulgence of this Court, against the order dated 30.12.2025 (Annexure P-7), vide which, his request for restoration of admission, and to take examinations of 3rd semester was not acceded to, in the light of Rule 16 of the Handbook of Information, 2025.

2) Since the facts of the present case would have a decisive bearing upon evaluation of the legality of the impugned order, it would be essential to have a brief and comprehend narration thereof.

3) The petitioner secured admission in the B.A/B.Com. LL.B. (Hons.) 5 Years Integrated Course with the respondent University, during the Session 2024-25. Accordingly, he appeared in the first semester examinati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top