SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3942

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJIT KAUR AND ANOTEHR – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amarjit Kaur and anr. ......Appellants Vs.

Nirmal Singh and others ......Respondents Date of Reserve: 06.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement: 19.02.2026 Uploaded on:- 23.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 20.02.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kapurthala in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.10,17,898/- along with interest @7% per annum, on account of death of Ajay Kumar @ Gama in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on

30.12.2019.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top