119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:18.02.2026 RAJNEESH OIL COMPANY AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs.

GAGAN SALES INDIA ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr.Akashdeep Miglani , Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Siddhant Jain, Advocate for the respondent.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29.08.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint on the grounds that it was barred by limitation and was not accompanied by the documents relied upon by the respondent/plaintiff, was dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, the respondent/plaintiff filed the present suit seeking recovery of Rs. 21,82,580/- on the basis of entries made in account books. The petitioner/defendant, disputing the claim, filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint. The said application was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, vide the impugned order. No