IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision.:17.02.2026 Balwinder Kaur @ Preeto and Another …..Appellants Vs.

Pippal Singh and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Puneet Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the appellants.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by two of the defendants assailing the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit filed by the plain’ffs—legal heirs of Jindo, has been partly decreed, and the appeal preferred by the present appellants has been dismissed by the learned Addi’onal District Judge, Ferozepur vide judgment dated 16.03.2023

2. The dispute pertains to the estate of Ujagar Singh, who admi4edly expired on 10.08.1969. It is not in controversy that he was owner in possession of the suit land. He had four daughters, namely Jindo, Kirpal Kaur, Harnam Kaur and Pritam Kaur. Pritam Kaur had pre-deceased him issue-less. Consequently, upon his death, he was survived by three daughters—Jindo, Kirpal Kaur and Harnam Kaur.

3. The plain’ffs are the legal heirs of Jindo. The defendants and proforma defendants are the legal heirs of