SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YADWINDER SINGH @ PAPPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :17.02.2026 Yadwinder Singh @ Pappu ......Petitioner Versus State ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. P.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. DAG Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

For the commission of offence punishable under Section 61-1-14 of Punjab Excise Act, the FIR No.7 dated 12.01.2002 was lodged in police Station Tapa. With regard to above mentioned FIR the petitioner was sent to face trial before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Barnala, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’. After trial the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate held the petitioner guilty for the commission of above mentioned offence, by virtue of judgment of conviction dated 08.03.2007, and on the same day, by virtue of order on quantum of sentence awarded following sentence to the petitioner:-

2. Aggrieved of the above mentioned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the petitioner preferred an appeal in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala, hereinafter being referred as ‘Appellate Court’. The appeal preferred b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top