SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PUNJAB AGRO FOODGRAINS CORPORATION LTD AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
M/S NANAK RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND ANOTHER – Respondent


271 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-404-2025 Date of decision: 16.02.2026 PUNJAB AGRO FOODGRAINS CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER ...Applicant(s)

VERSUS M/S NANAK RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Somesh Gupta, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)

1. The present application has been filed under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) seeking appointment of an independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences which have arisen between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that there was an agreement between the parties vide Annexure P-1 containing an arbitration clause i.e. Clause 26, which provides for appointment of an Arbitrator. He further submitted that the applicant, which is a Procurement Agency had appointed an Arbitrator who passed an award but thereafter, when the respondents filed the objections under Section 34 of the Act, the same were allowed vide judgment dated 18.08.2022 (Annexure P-3) on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top