SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MALL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : February 11, 2026 MALL SINGH -PETITIONER V/S UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Virat Rana, Advocate, and Mr. Mohd. Jameel, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jaivir S. Chandail, Addl. Standing Counsel, with Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No.1, 3 and 4.

Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant writ petition impugns the order dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-12) passed by the respondent No.1, whereby the allotment of House No. T-12/91, Sector 23, Chandigarh, made in favour of the petitioner, has been rescinded on the ground that the petitioner procured the allotment by furnishing incorrect and false information. Moreover, the impugned order renders the petitioner liable for payment of licence fee to the penal rent determined by the Government from time to time, for the duration of unauthorized possession of the house.

2. The concise and material facts engendering the instant writ petition are that the petitioner is serving as a Clerk in the Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh. Being

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top