SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHARAT SINGH AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:11.02.2026 Charat Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. H.S.Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

1. For the commission of offence punishable under Sections 326, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the FIR No.67 dated 15.08.1999 was lodged in Police Station Raman. Once the FIR was lodged, the investigation was taken up by the police, and as an outcome of abovesaid investigation, the petitioners were sent to the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Talwandi Sabo, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, to face the trial.

2. The petitioners participated in the above mentioned trial, which by virtue of judgment dated 19.12.2006 culminated into their conviction for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 34 IPC. Thus, by virtue of order on quantum of sentence, dated 21.12.2006, the petitioners were awarded sentences as under:-

3. Aggrieved of the above mentioned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top