IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

129+260 CR-4246-2024 (O&M)

Date of decision: 10.02.2026 Maharaja Sarup ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Shree Satnam Dharam Sabha ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Ms. Ritu Punj, Advocate Mr. Sarvesh Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant seeking setting aside of the order dated 19.07.2024 (Annexure P4) passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Barnala whereby the appellant has been directed to pay Rs.22,000/- per month as mesne profit during the pendency of the appeal from the date of passing of Eviction Order dated 28.08.2023. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/landlord had filed Eviction Petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. Vide order dated 28.08.2023, the said Rent Petition was allowed. The petitioner challenged the said order by way of Rent Appeal dated 13.10.2023 (Annexure P1), which is still pending. In the said appeal, respondent had filed an application dated 21.10.2023 (Annexure P2) for directing the petitioner-tenant to pay