SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL KUMAR GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
MAKHAN SINGH AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:26.02.2026 Sunil Kumar and Another ...Appellants Versus Makhan Singh and Others ...Respondents FAO-542-2004 (O&M)

Date of decision:26.02.2026 Gobind Ram Goyal and Another ...Appellants Versus Makhan Singh and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ravikant Berwal, Advocate for appellants in both the appeals.

Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.3 in both the appeals.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Appellants-claimants have filed two appeals which are being taken up together as both the claim petitions preferred by appellants- claimants arise out of the same accident and were decided by impugned award dated 01.10.2003, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bathinda (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’). Appellants-claimants in FAO-130-2004 being the husband and minor son of deceased Anita Rani (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’), aggrieved by the grant of compensation of Rs.1,87,000/- by learned Tribunal have sought enhancement of compensation. Appellants-claimants in FAO-542-2004 being the parents of deceased Vimal Goyal are aggrieved by the grant of com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top